Jump to 0 top | 1 navigation | 2 content | 3 extra information (sidebar) | 4 footer | 5 toolbar


Content

American Airlines Flight 587

I had find many products about Gas Cooking Ranges. Gas Cooking Ranges We make customize big size cooking ranges according to your kitchen requirements. Size 96 x 36 x 36 inches two oven for baking with inside grill Gas Cooking Rang

And you can see more from tri quad band wholesale baby gift novelty ceramic gift laser crystal gift marketing product promotions aluminum pole flag slim diet pad pearl bridal headbands unique anniversary gift
American Airlines Flight 587
Occurrence summary
Date
November 12, 2001(2001-11-12)
Type
Pilot error, design and training failures
Site
Queens, New York City, New York, United States
Passengers
251
Crew
9
Injuries
1 (ground)
Fatalities
265 (including 5 on the ground)
Survivors
0
Aircrafttype
Airbus A300-600
Operator
American Airlines
Tail number
N14053
Flight origin
John F. Kennedy International Airport
Destination
Las Amicas International Airport ,Dominican Republic
American Airlines Flight 587, an Airbus A300, crashed into the Belle Harbor neighborhood of Queens; a borough of New York City in New York, United States, shortly after takeoff from John F. Kennedy International Airport on November 12, 2001. Excluding the events of 9/11, this is the second deadliest U.S. aviation accident to date, after American Airlines Flight 191.
This accident is also the second highest death toll of any aviation accident involving an Airbus A300 after Iran Air Flight 655. It has surpassed China Airlines Flight 140 which crashed in Nagoya with 264 fatalities.
The accident took place two months after the September 11th attacks on the World Trade Center in Manhattan. Several factors, such as the date, aircraft size, airline, and location in New York, raised concerns that the crash was caused by another terrorist attack. Terrorism was officially ruled out as the cause by the National Transportation Safety Board, which instead attributed the disaster to the co-pilot's overuse of rudder controls.
Contents
1 Synopsis
2 Investigation
3 Aftermath
4 Responsibility
5 Victims
6 Memorial
7 Television documentaries
8 See also
9 References
10 External links
//
Synopsis

Flight 587, circled in white, can briefly be seen in this video still moving downward with a white streak behind the aircraft. This video, released by the NTSB, was recorded by a tollbooth camera located on the Marine Parkway-Gil Hodges Memorial Bridge.
On November 12, 2001, about 09:16 eastern standard time, American Airlines flight 587, an Airbus Industrie A300-605R, N14053, crashed into Belle Harbor, a New York City residential area, shortly after takeoff from John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York. Flight 587 was a regularly scheduled passenger flight to Las Amicas International Airport, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, with 2 flight crew members, seven flight attendants, and 251 passengers aboard the plane. Ed States served as the captain, and Sten Molin served as the first officer.
The plane's vertical stabilizer and rudder separated in flight and fell into Jamaica Bay, about 1 mile north of the main wreckage site. The plane's engines subsequently separated in flight and fell several blocks north and east of the main wreckage site. All 260 people aboard the plane and 5 people on the ground died, and the impact forces and a post-crash fire destroyed the plane. Flight 587 operated under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 121 on an instrument flight rules flight plan. Visual meteorological conditions (VMC) prevailed at the time of the accident.
Investigation

National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) employee Brian Murphy (second from right) updates NTSB Chairman Marion Blakey (third from right) on the investigation of the tail fin and rudder from AA flight 587 (February 11, 2002)
The A300-600, which took off minutes after a Japan Airlines Boeing 747 on the same runway, flew into the larger jet's wake, an area of turbulent air referred to as wake turbulence. The first officer attempted to keep the plane upright with aggressive rudder inputs. The strength of the air flowing against the moving rudder stressed the aircraft's vertical stabilizer and eventually snapped it off entirely, causing the aircraft to lose control and crash. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) concluded that the enormous stress on the rudder was due to the first officer's "unnecessary and excessive" rudder inputs, and not the wake turbulence caused by the 747. The NTSB further stated "if the first officer had stopped making additional inputs, the aircraft would have stabilized". However, contributing to these rudder pedal inputs were characteristics of the Airbus A300-600 sensitive rudder system design and elements of the American Airlines Advanced Aircraft Maneuvering Training Program. The A300 family has the distinction of having the lightest breakout force and the highest number of degrees of rudder travel per pound of force of any other transport category aircraft. Once a pilot initiates rudder movement, he or she will be challenged with the most sensitive rudder handling qualities of any transport category airplane. This...(and so on)

You can also see some feature products :

top flight flagpole automatic pot stirrer Heating Pet Pad mobie daul band lnb c band name badge lanyards shirt packing pin diamond grinding pad cloisonne lapel pins 2009 wall calendar diamond polishng pad Plastic Name Badge wooden office coasters insect themed gifts wall folding calendar good for promotion paper promotion gifts wooden tea coasters watchbox watch band wholesale basket gifts emblem and badge

  • No ratings
  • No ratings
  • No ratings
  • No ratings
  • No ratings
  • 0 ratings

Health threat from cosmic rays

I had find many products about lady wrist watches. lady wrist watches Movement: Automatic Movement Functions:hours, minutes, seconds ,chronographCrystal: sapphire glass to withstand scratches , formed of corundum, Case:white stainless steel Bracelet: stainless steelDial: Black,white, blueDimensions: mm To know more about our company, Please kindly visit our website at Http://avi-eshop.com Http://foreverswiss.com http://avixiao.en.alibaba.com lady wrist watches more

And you can see more from coach signature duffle lighting parts??ewel case golf head case Double CD Cases dvd clear case aluminum cddvd case clamshell cd cases Cigarette Lighter Case Fender Guitar Cases
The health threat from cosmic rays is the danger posed by cosmic rays generated by the Sun and other stars to astronauts on interplanetary missions. Cosmic rays consists of high energy protons and other nuclei. They are one of the most important barriers standing in the way of plans for interplanetary travel by crewed spacecraft.
Contents
1 The deep-space radiation environment
2 Effects
3 Mitigation
3.1 Shielding
3.2 Drugs
3.3 Timing of missions
4 See also
5 Notes
6 References
7 External links
//
The deep-space radiation environment
The radiation environment of deep space is very different from that on the earth's surface or in low earth orbit, due to the much larger flux of high-energy galactic cosmic rays (GCRs), along with radiation from solar proton events and the radiation belts.
Life on the earth's surface is protected from galactic cosmic rays by a number of factors:
The earth's atmosphere is opaque to primary cosmic rays with energies below about 1 GeV, so only secondary radiation can reach the surface. The secondary radiation is also attentuated by absorption in the atmosphere, as well as by radioactive decay in flight of some particles, such as muons.
Shielding by the bulk of the planet itself cuts the flux by a factor of two.
Except for the very highest energy galactic cosmic rays, the radius of gyration in the earth's magnetic field is small enough to ensure that they are deflected away from Earth ("geomagnetic shielding");
The sun's magnetic field has a similar effect, tending to exclude galactic cosmic rays from the plane of the ecliptic in the inner solar system.
As a result the energy input of GCRs to the atmosphere is negligible about 10?9 of solar radiation - roughly the same as starlight.
Of the above four factors, all but the first one apply to low earth orbit craft, such as the International Space Station. Therefore, the only astronauts who have ever been exposed to a significant radiation flux from galactic cosmic rays are those in the Apollo program. Since the durations of the Apollo missions were days rather than years, the doses involved were small compared to what would occur, for example, on a crewed mission to Mars.
Effects
Like other ionizing radiation, high-energy cosmic rays can damage DNA, increasing the risk of cancer, cataracts, neurological disorders, and non-cancer mortality risks.
The Apollo astronauts reported seeing flashes in their eyeballs, which may have been galactic cosmic rays, and there is some speculation that they may have experienced a higher incidence of cancer. However, the duration of the longest Apollo flights was less than two weeks, limiting the maximum exposure. There were only 24 such astronauts, making statistical analysis of the effects nearly impossible.
The health threat depends on the flux, energy spectrum, and nuclear composition of the rays. The flux and energy spectrum depend on a variety of factors: short-term solar weather, long-term trends (such as an apparent increase since the 1950s), and position in the sun's magnetic field. These factors are incompletely understood. The Mars Radiation Environment Experiment (MARIE) was launched in 2001 in order to collect more data. Estimates are that humans unshielded in interplanetary space would receive annually roughly 400 to 900 mSv (compared to 2.4 mSv on Earth) and that a Mars mission (12 months in flight and 18 months on Mars) might expose shielded astronauts to ~500 to 1000 mSv. These doses approach the 1 to 4 Sv career limits advised by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements for Low Earth orbit activities.
The quantitative biological effects of cosmic rays are poorly known, and are the subject of ongoing research. Several experiments, both in space and on Earth, are being carried out to evaluate the exact degree of danger. Experiments at Brookhaven National Laboratory's Booster accelerator revealed that the biological damage due to a given exposure is actually about half what was previously estimated: specifically, it turns out that low energy protons cause more damage than high energy ones. This is explained by the fact that slower particles have more time to interact with molecules in the body.
Mitigation
Shielding
Material shielding may be partially effective against galactic cosmic rays in certain energy ranges, but may actually make the problem worse for some of the higher energy rays, because more shielding causes an increased amount of secondary radiation. The aluminum walls of the ISS, for example, are believed to have a net beneficial effect. In interplanetary space, however, it is believed that aluminum shielding would have a negative net effect.
Several strategies are being studied for ameliorating the effects of this radiation hazard for planned human...(and so on)

You can also see some feature products :

Micro Computer Case dell laptop case wooden tool case leather cellphone case discount travel luggage discount rolling luggage nine west luggage bags / case ata shipping case ipod shuffle case thomas whlde. cases kodak camera case pc watch case handbag wallet luggage ipod video case power acquisition case field desk case promotion products/65292;lamp case paper board cases mp3 leather cases PDA Aluminum Case

  • No ratings
  • No ratings
  • No ratings
  • No ratings
  • No ratings
  • 0 ratings
Pages: 1 (1 - 2 / 2)